Three demos, running live.

Rich interactive graphics usually come with a performance cost: a beautiful hero section that drops a mid-range phone to fifteen frames a second.

The same particle system that runs behind this site's homepage, with its internals exposed. Change the particle count and the morph stage and watch the frame counter respond.

Up to 30,000 particles are drawn in a single draw call. Five target shapes are uploaded once as GPU attributes, and morphing happens entirely in the vertex shader from one scroll-driven value, so the CPU never recalculates a position. Particle budget and pixel ratio are chosen per device, and the whole thing is replaced by a static frame when a visitor prefers reduced motion.

An enquiry arrives, someone reads it, someone copies it into a CRM, someone decides who should answer, someone remembers to follow up. Every step is a place to lose it.

A working visualisation of an automated intake pipeline. Send a request through it and watch it get classified, enriched, routed and logged, including the branch where the model isn't sure and asks a person.

Most useful automation looks like this: a series of small, predictable steps, with a model only where judgement is really needed and a clear path for when it isn't sure. The interesting engineering is in the branch that admits it doesn't know.

Site speed affects growth, not just developers. Slow pages lose visitors before the marketing gets a chance to work, and most sites have no idea what their real numbers are.

This is the site measuring itself, in your browser, right now. These are real Core Web Vitals from your visit, not a screenshot of a good score from someone else's machine.

The numbers come from your browser's own Performance APIs: PerformanceObserver for paint and layout-shift entries, and Navigation Timing for the rest. We set up the same measurement on client sites, so conversations about speed start from real numbers.